Total Posts : 6 posts
Colorado companies are just five months from being legally accountable for their AI. An artwork assembled entirely from secondhand, racist souvenirs explains what AI firms should be checking.
“The means by which we live have outdistanced the ends for which we live. Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men.” – Martin Luther King, Jr. (1929-1968) In one of MLK's sermons published in 1963's Strength to Love,
![AI Quote, Explained: Yoshua Bengio: "People demanding that AIs have rights [are making] a huge mistake...."](https://storage.ghost.io/c/c3/12/c312024e-2de9-4ef4-9f8f-b57e7bc252bf/content/images/2026/01/Bengio_16x9_black_bg_1920x1080--1-.jpg)
“People demanding that AIs have rights [are making] a huge mistake. Frontier AI models already show signs of self-preservation in experimental settings today, and eventually giving them rights would mean we’re not allowed to shut them down. “As their capabilities and degree of agency grow, we need to
As artificial intelligence enters the medical and mental health fields, voices from CU Boulder and Colorado Anschutz urge careful design, fairness, and empathy.
Can we balance innovation with human rights and privacy concerns? What about AI's environmental harms and its potential for major job displacement? And might we have a legal duty to use AI if it saves our clients money?
Who is ultimately responsible for ensuring the ethical use of AI? This is a question graduate students at the University of Colorado Boulder were asked to grapple with during the school’s annual Interdisciplinary Ethics Tech Competition earlier this month. All three of us on my team – two law students,
Sign up today to get weekly email updates and to comment on selected articles.
Subscribe Now
